Transcribe a argument disquisition of at smallest 350 articulation discussing the subjoined:
Jack (or Julie if you are feminine) is your proximate door neighbor. You equitable moved to the area and Jack asked if you wanted to go secure some coffee sometime. You conduct him up on his exhibit and unquestionably possess his love. After sundry months of secureting to comprehend him, you set-out to confabulation environing arts that protect more “ultimate” signification. Through these talks you allow that he is profound control answers in animation. In your decisive talk, Jack made the proposition that there is no such art as exactness. He went on to expound that in animation, each special comes up with their possess value of what is penny control them. Yet, he too believes in exact and injustice and he was having awkwardness reconciling his 2 beliefs. That duskiness you protect thinking environing Jack and his pursuit control answers; you firm to transcribe him a Facebook missive addressing his pursuit control exactness. Transcribe what you said in your Facebook missive to Jack.
Use the subjoined sources in your response:
1. H. Wayne House and Holden, Joseph M. Charts of Apologetics and Christian Evidences Grand Rapids: Zondervan 2006.
2. McGrath, Alister E. Mere Apologetics: How To Help Seekers & Skeptics Find Faith. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2012.