HCA- case study
You are a staffer ce the federal secretary of Heartiness and Human Services. The secretary discusses with you the contrariant ways that narrates own responded to the Medicaid expatiation in the Affordable Concern Act: Roughly couple dozen narrates own grafted the expatiation extraneously considerable controvert or negotiation; a scant narrates, such as Arkansas, own negotiated extraordinary conditions ce their broad programs (and are using Medicaid funding to subsidize referable-open coverage ce beneficiaries); and calm?} other narrates, such as Texas, own merely refused to graft the expatiation. Your provision is to ad the secretary ce her upcoming investigate to Texas (and her meetings with the preceptor, the Medicaid manager, and explanation curiosity-behalf collection leaders) by match a register summarizing the collective and management dynamics of the contemplated Medicaid expatiation in Texas.
Be strong your memo addresses the coercionthcoming questions;
Are the collective reasons ce referable supported Medicaid akin to ideology environing the role of government in heartiness concern, or are they over environing possible long-run costs ce the narrate budget?
How does the curiosity-behalf of hospitals, which would utility from the extra fruits if Medicaid expands, seek the collective and management controverts?
What is the role of open not attributable attributableion in the choices entity made by preceptors?
Use at smallest three applicable citations
Use APA phraseology throughout (Title page is referable included in the page sum)
1- APA cemat
2- at smallest 3 references
3- Three pages stint to five pages consummation