M3 Assignment 2 case study
Create a predicament narrative for a special with an addiction and a spiritual empiricism. Do referable embody identifying knowledge. Embody the subjoined elements in your predicament narrative:
Demographics—including seniority, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, connubial status, enumerate and senioritys of offspring, prop arrangements, and godliness if applicable
Previous psychiatric composition of patient
Previous chemical composition of patient
Medical narrative—including disabilities if applicable
Work and advice narrative
Legal or financial concerns
Concerned special involvement
Analyze the predicament narrative and tender your distinction as allied to pith correction empiricisms. Embody the subjoined in your distinction:
Summarize clew predicament consider elements you would correction to formulate a distinction and conduct your composition artfulness.
Identify at meanest brace duty tools that you would correction to formulate a distinction. Justify why you possess selected these tools.
State your distinction allied to pith correction empiricisms. Justify your reasons for your distinction.
Identify other concerns and tender recommendations and referral opportunities. Justify your reasons and explanations.
Write a 3–4-pseniority relation in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Correction the subjoined rasp naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M3_A2.doc.
By the ascribable epoch assigned, liberate your assignment to the Submissions Area.