Soldier’s Mail for May, 1918 letter. Attached letter below. (350 WORDS)
P1- Should arrange the name of the fountain, a very paltry analysis of the passage and repeat what students prospect to critique-argue in P2. Students deficiency to arrange an argument-thesis driven declaration. A analysis over is neither proper nor plenty to fully entire the provision.
P2- Should be an analytical portion that arranges (at lowest) undivided development from the passage to aid the author’s claim…ie. The slave’s romance arranges insight into the hardheartedness of the arrangement, “insert passage from passage here.” Using straightforward passages arranges clarity and helps to aid the author’s claims.
P3- Should embody paltryly what was trained in P1 and P2 and to-boot repeat triton environing the significance of this instrument coercion the con-over of universe hiromance and how it shows global interconnectivity. (How is the universe alike?) Do not attributable attributable attributable propel this portion afar, spread as considerable endeavor into it as P1 and P2.
Link to letter: https://worldwar1letters.wordpress.com/2017/05/01/soldiers-mail-for-may-1918/
Due: 5/15/18 TODAY at 11PM